Tom Franklin Consulting Ltd
No 5
17-
London
NW3 3DS
07989 948 221
Registered in England and Wales No. 6948162
Last updated: 06 October 2014
Franklin Consulting
Standards and service oriented approaches
Innovation Base for sharing models and modelling experience
The Higher Education community produces a considerable number of models of the activity within institutions. Process models, data models and so forth. There has long been an expressed desire to share models in order to reduce effort. The Innovation Base was created as a focus for sharing models, while being neutral to the type of models. We discovered along the way that there is surprisingly little modelling taking place and that the level of expertise within the community is very low, with the result that very few people have models that they are willing and able to share.
The Project final report recommended that there be more support for a community of practice in modelling.
As part of the project Franklin Consulting undertook a survey of modelling practice in UK Higher Education.
E-
This site introduces a technical framework designed to support e-
This is not intended to be prescriptive, nor will it deny practitioners or institutions
the capability to deliver distinctive forms of learning. Nor is it intended to restrict
the choices of systems that institutions may purchase (whether commercial, freeware
or open source). Instead, what we hope to present in this document is a set of patterns
that can be used to implement a variety of e-
Although we set out a service framework for e-
Our starting point has been the “very high level Use Case” of learner-
This framework is very explicitly centred on the learning and teaching aspects of further and higher education institutions and organisations in the UK. We are very aware that this is only one perspective, and there are other areas, such as logistics, HR and finance, which may also benefit from the approach taken. Although services defined for this framework may be usable for purposes other than learning and teaching, we make no guarantees that the service definitions will be suitable for other domains.
It believed that the framework will provide benefits to teachers and learners by:
And benefit institutions by
The paper first discusses the rationale for developing a service oriented framework
for managed learning environments (MLE) and e-
It is intended as a starting point. The service definitions will need refinement and expansion and many of the details have to be worked out. Additional services will almost certainly be identified and some of the existing ones may be merged or dropped. It is also likely that the standards and specifications listed will not be completely correct, with new ones emerging from time to time. This document is therefore offered to help open discussion and we include just one example of how work might proceed to more fully define the services.
This work has been superceded by the e-
Technology Enhanced Learning: Conformance -
Reports written for the Technology Enhanced Learning: Conformance -
Interoperability Specifications for e-
Test system requirements -
Acceptance Test Criteria -
I
Process Improvement |
Web 2.0 |
E-learning, pedagogy and Learning environments |
Portals |
Wireless and ubiquitous computing |
Programme and project Evaluations |
Standards and service oriented approaches |
Portal implementations |
VLE Support |
Assessment and Feedback |
Process Improvement |
Web 2.0 |
E-learning, pedagogy and Learning environments |
Portals |
Wireless and ubiquitous computing |
Programme and project Evaluations |
Standards and service oriented approaches |
Portal implementations |
VLE Support |
Assessment and Feedback |
Process Improvement |
Web 2.0 |
E-learning, pedagogy and Learning environments |
Portals |
Wireless and ubiquitous computing |
Programme and project Evaluations |
Standards and service oriented approaches |
Portal implementations |
VLE Support |
Assessment and Feedback |