|
University
|
VLE support staff
|
Student support
|
VLE development staff
|
Staff
development
|
Faculty / school
support
|
VLE
|
|
Lund (Sweden)
|
1/2 time person on our computer centre does the
general server maintainence, supervision, and backup
|
Student support on LUVIT issues is integrated as
a smal fraction in a general student helpdesk. Two older students
4- 5 hours a day provides this service. Let us estimate that LUVIT
issues make up for less than 1 hour a day.
|
|
One fulltime person (shared between myself and
one collegue) does the:
-
application service and administration of our VLE (called
LUVIT)
- teacher
heldesk for LUVIT
- course
design consulting for LUVIT
- staff
training on LUVIT
(in addition we do
staff training on web pedagogics in F2F and
online courses)
|
|
We run now 2 LUVIT servers with 6.287 and 5.654
participants respectivelly.
They contain about 550 courses.
|
|
UCL
|
Two of our technical staff are responsible for
the technical running of the WebCT server, but not full time by any
means - it's one of the many servers they administer.
|
|
|
2
|
There are also four "FISOs", allocated to one
faculty each, such as myself
- and one of the things we do is train/support
staff in their use of the VLE as well as other e- learning
things.
|
WebCT
|
|
FE college - Anon
|
we have 'me' to do most of what you suggest And
I'm seconded elsewhere for half my time! Of course we have
the IT Services Manager who is rebuilding our Intranet and trying
to make it work with Moodle
|
|
|
|
|
Moodle
|
|
HE College
(8000 students, 300 staff)
|
3 staff who provide support for learning
technology This is not totally their main function so would not be
3 FTE's
|
0
|
The real number in terms of FTE is probably zero.
One of the systems people does it as a 'hobby', they upgrade and
patch for us as is necessary (with very minor customisation).
Probably about 3-5 days a year in total. (Though we also have a
support contract with moodle.com)
|
This is the same three people who support
learning technology
|
|
|
|
Harper Adams
|
|
|
1 at present, soon to become 3.5 following CETL
bid.
this is a central team, serving the whole
college.
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1992 university
18,000 students
|
have 5 staff:
LT Manager
VLE Systems Co- ordinator
Learning Technologists x 2
Clerical Assistant x 1
Blackboard isn’t, of course,
|
|
All of the above play a part:
– the VLE Systems Co- ordinator has a
specific role to both develop the VLE within the broader systems
and to provide technical user support
- the Learning Technologists support Bb users as
an when required as well as developing content intended to be
delivered, where possible, through the VLE
- The LT Fellows support their own constituents
with day- to-day issues and provide a local context
|
EDU (Education Development Unit – separate
to our Division) provide the formal training through an external
trainer. This is technical in orientation, and I am increasingly
concerned that it misses the point somewhat by failing to focus
directly on the issues of online pedagogy.
The reason for this split between training and
support /development is political. We must move towards developing
a better staff awareness of the issues related to the use of online
learning and not simply show them how to ‘do’ things in
Blackboard – if we move to WebCT or MOODLE in the
future many of our staff would be lost –
they are being specifically skilled in Bb
|
The University has appointed four Learning
Technologies Fellows (0.5WTE, 2-year
appointments initially, one per Faculty) to
‘connect’ the Centre to the Schools
and Faculties. The current Fellows consist of two
‘academics’ and two colleagues
from a more technical/curriculum support
background. This was purely by chance
following an open call and interviews.
|
Blackboard
|
|
Post- 1992 University
25,000 students
|
|
|
In house VLE at present; about to recruit for 5
staff involved in curriculum design and content creation, with at
least two of the new recruits will be involved in academic
professional development as part of their design positions
|
Small team of in-house developers (but this is
changing from a dedicated team to an institutional development
capability)
|
Varies across faculties; no common approach
|
In house VLE
|
|
University of the Arts London
|
Primary support, research and development related
to the University's VLE is handled through the IT Research and
Development Unit and employs 12 FT and 2 PT staff
At any one time there are usually 2 ITRDU FTEs
directly involved with VLE support for staff.
|
Most colleges handle VLE student support through
IT
|
In the ITRDU we have about 4 FTEs who are
directly involved with e- learning software
developments, this includes software extensions to our VLE
(Blackboard) - Building Block development.
|
Some staff support through colleges is handled by
local e- learning staff - about one person per college. college
staff are coordinated through the ITRDU's Technology in the
Learning Environment (TILE) group That is 4 FTEs but they are
also involved with other e- learning activities.
We have 2 or 3 staff within the ITRDU who are
involved with staff development related to e- learning. We run
central VLE training, workshops and demonstrations of good
practice, online courses and conferences. Our provision of
e-learning related staff developments partly overlaps with central
IT and HR training courses.
|
|
|
|
Loughborough University
Our VLE isn't ringfenced as far as content
providers are concerned, so the content comes from academics,
departmental support staff, faculty support staff and central
support staff, with Computing Services looking after the operations
side and developments. These staff may also contribute to other
online sites and services, unconnected with the VLE.
|
1.3 FTE
|
|
0.3 FTE, but in practice other non- dedicated
staff both within and outside Computing Services are called on,
esp. for testing and trialing new developments.
|
4 FTE in Professional Development, but all
Learning Technologists contribute to the staff development
programme one way or another (includes Distance Learning
support).
We are pretty certain that our support provision
is below average, and is complicated by the decentralized nature of
the university. And of course what constitutes the
"appropriate level of support" depends on a whole load of
factors.
|
Faculties: We have just appointed 5 FTE Online
Development Officers on 2- year contracts, to add to the 4 already
in post.
tends to be the largest departments. 2 FTE
+ 2 *
Schools / Departments: 0.5 FTE dedicated
staff.
It is not uncommon for existing IT support staff
in the departments to assist academics with content provision on an
ad hoc basis. This is rarely part of their job description, but may
take up 0.15 FTE of their time.
|
The VLE itself is a home- brew based on an Apache
server running on Linux, with added open source tools for
discussion boards, blogs etc. The CAA system (QM Perception 3.4) is
separate from the VLE, but accessed via it.
We constantly examine the VLE marketplace, but
haven't found a pre- packaged solution which offers us more than we
have already got.
|
|
York St John
5000 students
240 Academic staff
|
One full-time e-learning adviser
|
|
The e-learning adviser does this, with support
from IT services. We use WebCT
|
This is the main role of our e-learning
adviser
|
none
|
|
|
University of Stirling
|
1 Manager/System admin
|
|
|
1 CPD specialist
|
1 individual for each faculty (there are 4)
|
|
|
Waterloo University, Canada
|
1.5 FTE (one full time position, and one half)
who provide faculty and student technology support (documentation,
hands-on courses, help response, support for pedagogical staff,
announcements, etc.).
1.0 FTE (two half positions) as the systems
persons in charge of planning the technology path (upgrades,
hardware systems, local infrastructure connections, expert
knowledge on VLE workings and database)
|
|
Regarding the first answer above, part of the
central staff time (the 1.0 FTE) goes towards integration and some
development and customization associated with integration and local
tools development (our VLE, ANGEL, facilitates adding local tools
quite nicely). Perhaps 0.3 of that 1.0 FTE may go to this
task.
There is also about another 0.7 FTE from the LT
centre based on a person who looks at developing new ideas for the
VLE, thus far devoted to migrating from the old mostly homegrown
system, and looking at an e- portfolio system. This 0.7 is in
addition to the 1.0 FTE in the IT department mentioned
earlier.
We have decided that for the initial stages, at
least, we will contract with our vendor to develop significant
functionality we see missing, and for which we are willing to pay.
We may decide to do some of our own functionality development
later.
|
That number does not include:
- computer platform support including operating
system support, system builds, student information systems used for
classlists, central authentication, etc., which are done by other
components of the central computing support group.
|
Approximately 4.0 FTE in "official" support,
comprised of 4 half-time positions and two full-time. (The Faculty
of Arts has a full-time person because of higher uptake in that
area; similarly Accountancy within Arts has a half-time person.)
These are staff members from a learning technology (LT) centre on
campus and they work in the six Faculties.
They provide the first point of contact for
faculty members, and provide course and instructional design
support along with some technical assistance during course
development (backed up by the 1.5 FTE IT support mentioned
above).
We have seen an emergence of support from the
Faculty computer consulting offices. In two Faculties (of the 6)
the computing directors have designated support staff who
participate in the support of instructors wanting to get started in
the VLE, while in others it is more informal support
emergence.
|
|
|
FE College
7,000 students
|
2 staff who do everything, but due to cuts in
funding from LSC this is likely to fall to 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|